犯罪类话题经典难题-罪罚应否等同

雅思大作文经典难题...



在雅思大作文的话题类型中，犯罪类话题可以说会让大部分烤鸭们“望风而逃”。原因可能就是因为对“法律，犯罪”相关素材以及词汇积累较空白所造成的莫名恐惧感。那我们今天就这个问题探讨一下。

在上述类型话题中曾经出过一道题目是讨论是否应该一概而论用对不同的犯罪类型应用同样的惩罚。原话题是这样的：

Some people believe that there should befixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that thecircumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it,should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment.

 

Discuss both these views and give your ownopinion.

 

从题目我们可以看到背景是“同罪同罚，还是酌情而论”。题目类型是报告型，这就意味着我们在写作的时候要更注意兼顾双方论点。开始写作之前，我一向建议考生不要急于开始写作，而是花上5分钟左右的时间构思一下整体思路。理清正反观点，并整理自己的论点和论据。根据这个问题，我的思路如下：

fixed punishment： proves justice

different punishment:  to protect the innocent and to punish theoffenders, to avoid unjustified conviction.

以上是我关于这篇文章一个简单的思路整理，当然要展开写作，中间还需要更多素材和事例的加入。详细可参考后附的范文。

在我的课堂上，关于每一大类的作文话题都整理了一部分的通用思路以帮助学生建立自己的写作大纲。因为在我看来，雅思考试中的输出类科目中阻碍大家取得理想成绩的因素无非是“逻辑和语言“。所谓逻辑先行，如果没有好的表达中心，再”高端“的词汇或者句型都不能获得高分，反之如果语言表达再流畅自然，没有中心，没有灵魂的文章或者口头叙述也一样。所以，众烤鸭如果希望能过五关，斩六将，则需修炼下内功了。

好，长话短说，下面我们一起看看此篇的范文：

Nowadays,a growing number of people concern about whether alltypes of crimes should be convicted equally.  However,the cons hold an opposite view that the decisions ought to be made on morecase-dependent evidences.  From myperspective, the punishments should be measured by including morethorough considerations.

First, it is obvious that in manyscenarios, the definition of some certain types of crime can be considerablysubtle. This is because that the line liesbetween legal and illegal is surprisingly thin.  So punishing whoever “crosses the line” with nointensive and outright consideration may result in “unjustifiedconviction”, in worse situation, conflicts between different social groups.

Additionally, one of the most critical “laws” of thelegal system is to be “fair” disregarding who the offender is, where the one isfrom and even how important the one is.  Being fair, as per myunderstanding, is being just in all circumstance.  To exemplify, a man hurts or even killssomeone for proper defense (when being robbed or threatened by murder) shouldnot be judged the same as those who commit homicide deliberately.  While that is not to say that applying standardizedpunishment is not justified or righteous.  Thereis no doubt that standardization can illustrate the nonnegotiablefairness, unwavering justice and unchanged legitimate spirit of law.  Meanwhile, equal punishment also proves that"there is no exception in front of law".  But measures like these need to be conducted undercautious thinking.

To sum, there are good reasons supportingboth views yet the latter seems to be more practical andhumane. In the mean time, witand wisdom of our law protectors may be necessary as well.  By doing so, we can ensure thatthe innocent can be sheltered by the law and noperpetrators will flee from justice.

字数298。 大家在研读范文的同时， 不妨注意下我在文中所嵌入的逻辑关系，以及中心句的编排。基本上每个句子都有其作用。

    关注 存盛